Parameter Viewer

Document ID ca-dtdgcdwq-2022-12-23-5 Title Draft technical document guidelines for Canadian drinking water quality - Antimony: Management strategies, international consideration URL https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/programs/consultation-draft-technical-document-guidelines-canadian-drinking-water-quality-antimony/management-strategies-international-considerations.html Jurisdiction /ca Subdomain(s) Drinking water, Water quality standards, Monitoring and analysis Language en Status completed Analyzed at 2026-03-19 09:23:18.944243+00:00 Relevance Draft technical guidance on antimony MAC, monitoring, and management for utilities.

Q Qualitative Requirements (27)

Req ID Category Intent Legal Status Name Subdomain(s) Context Conditions Confidence
#Q001operationalhealthrecommendedRisk management approach implementationdrinking waterAll water utilities should implement a risk management approach, such as the source-to-tap or water safety plan approach, to ensure water safety (CCME, 2004; WHO, 2011, 2012).high
#Q002operationaloperationalmandatorySystem assessment requirementsdrinking waterThese approaches require a system assessment to characterize the source water, describe the treatment barriers that prevent or reduce contamination, identify the conditions that can result in contamination, and implement control measures.When implementing a risk management approachhigh
#Q003monitoringoperationalmandatoryOperational monitoring and protocolsdrinking waterOperational monitoring is then established, and operational/management protocols are instituted (for example, standard operating procedures, corrective actions and incident responses).As part of the risk management or water safety plan approachhigh
#Q004monitoringoperationalmandatoryCompliance monitoring and validation protocolsdrinking waterCompliance monitoring is determined and other protocols to validate the water safety plan are implemented (for example, record keeping, consumer satisfaction).As part of the risk management or water safety plan approachhigh
#Q005operationaloperationalmandatoryOperator trainingdrinking waterOperator training is also required to ensure the effectiveness of the water safety plan at all times (Smeets et al., 2009).high
#Q006treatmenttreatmentguidanceControl strategies for high antimony sourcesdrinking waterIn water sources with higher than acceptable antimony concentrations a treatment option discussed in the section on treatment considerations may be implemented, or non-treatment strategies such as blending or alternative water supplies can be considered.In water sources with higher than acceptable antimony concentrationshigh
#Q007designtreatmentrecommendedAntimony species identification and pilot testingdrinking waterWhen the option of a treatment technology is chosen, the species of antimony should be identified and pilot-scale testing is recommended to ensure the source water can be successfully treated and process design is established.When the option of a treatment technology is chosenhigh
#Q008operationaloperationalmandatoryWater quality evaluation prior to source changedrinking waterAttention must be given to the water quality of a new source prior to making any changes (for instance, switching, blending and interconnecting) to an existing water supply.Prior to making any changes to an existing water supplyhigh
#Q009operationalhealthrecommendedControl strategy minimization goaldrinking waterAs it is difficult to control the accumulation and release of antimony and other contaminants of health concern in the distribution system, the control strategy should minimize the antimony concentration that enters the distribution system from the treatment plant.high
#Q010operationaloperationalrecommendedDistribution system quality managementdrinking waterGenerally, the distribution system should be managed such that drinking water is transported from the treatment plant to the consumer with minimum loss of quality.high
#Q011designoperationalmandatorySystem-specific control strategy requirementdrinking waterAs source waters, treatment plants and distribution systems can differ significantly, a system-specific control strategy would be necessary.high
#Q012monitoringoperationalrecommendedSource water characterizationdrinking waterWater sources should be characterized to determine if antimony is present.high
#Q013monitoringoperationalrecommendedSource water monitoring frequencydrinking waterMonitoring of source water should be conducted yearly.high
#Q014monitoringoperationalguidanceReduced monitoring for source waterdrinking waterAuthorities may consider reduced monitoring when it has been demonstrated that antimony is not present and/or appropriate treatment is in place.When it has been demonstrated that antimony is not present and/or appropriate treatment is in placehigh
#Q015monitoringtreatmentrecommendedTreatment operational monitoringdrinking waterWhere treatment is required to remove antimony, operational monitoring should be implemented to confirm whether the treatment process is functioning as required (that is, paired samples of source and treated water to confirm the efficacy of treatment).Where treatment is required to remove antimonyhigh
#Q016monitoringtreatmentrecommendedAdsorption operational monitoring frequencydrinking waterFor example, if adsorption is used, at least quarterly monitoring should be conducted or a method to estimate BVs to breakthrough should be used to predict media replacement.If adsorption is usedhigh
#Q017monitoringhealthrecommendedCompliance monitoring frequency for treated waterdrinking waterWhen treatment is in place for antimony removal, it is recommended that compliance monitoring for total antimony be conducted annually, at a minimum, to confirm the proposed MAC is not exceeded.When treatment is in place for antimony removalhigh
#Q018monitoringoperationalrecommendedCompliance monitoring sample collection protocoldrinking waterSamples should be collected after treatment prior to distribution (typically at the entry point prior to the distribution system) and analyzed by an accredited laboratory.high
#Q019monitoringoperationalrecommendedDistribution system monitoring requirementdrinking waterConsequently, monitoring should also be conducted throughout the distribution system when antimony is or was historically present in the source and/or distributed water.When antimony is or was historically present in the source and/or distributed waterhigh
#Q020designoperationalrecommendedDistribution system monitoring program designdrinking waterMonitoring programs should be designed on a system-specific basis to verify that control strategies are operating as intended and consider risk factors that contribute to the likelihood that antimony may be elevated within the drinking water system.high
#Q021monitoringoperationalguidanceIndicators for monitoring antimony releasedrinking waterFactors that influence antimony accumulation and mobilization, such as changes to water chemistry and physical/hydraulic disturbances in the distribution system, could be used as indicators of when and where to monitor for antimony release.high
#Q022monitoringoperationalrecommendedMonitoring during disruptionsdrinking waterMonitoring for total antimony and other contaminants (for example, iron, manganese, arsenic, lead) should be conducted when water quality changes or physical disruptions occur in the system.When water quality changes or physical disruptions occur in the systemhigh
#Q023monitoringoperationalrecommendedSelection of distribution monitoring sitesdrinking waterThe number and location of sites for monitoring of antimony in the distribution system, including sampling at the tap, should take into consideration the site-specific accumulation and release risk factors.high
#Q024operationaloperationalrecommendedInterpretation of discoloured water absencedrinking waterHowever, the absence of discoloured water should not be interpreted as the absence of a metals release.high
#Q025monitoringoperationalguidanceReduced monitoring for distribution systemdrinking waterWater utilities that have baseline data indicating that antimony is not present within the distribution system may conduct less frequent monitoring.When utilities have baseline data indicating that antimony is not present within the distribution systemhigh
#Q026monitoringhealthrecommendedPrivate well testing recommendationdrinking waterHouseholds with private wells are encouraged to have their water tested for total antimony to ensure that the concentration in their water supply is below the proposed MAC.Households with private wellshigh
#Q027monitoringtreatmentrecommendedResidential treatment device monitoringdrinking waterIn addition, homeowners with private wells using residential treatment devices should conduct routine testing on both the water entering the treatment device and the treated water to verify that the treatment device is effective.Homeowners with private wells using residential treatment deviceshigh

P Quantitative Requirements (31)

Req ID Category Intent Legal Status Name Subdomain(s) Limit Type Limit Value Context Conditions Confidence
#P001chemicalhealthrecommendedAntimony (Health Canada - proposed MAC)drinking waterMAC0.006 mg/LHealth Canada proposed MAC (2022). Key endpoint: Liver effects: anisokaryosis; biochemical changes related to liver histological changes.high
#P002chemicalhealthmandatoryAntimony (U.S. EPA-MCL)drinking waterrequirement0.006 mg/LU.S. EPA-MCL (1992; 2018). Key endpoint: Decreased lifespan, increased blood glucose and cholesterol.high
#P003chemicalhealthguidelineAntimony (WHO)drinking waterunknown0.02 mg/LWHO (2003). Key endpoint: Reduced body weight gain and reduced food and water intake in rats.high
#P004chemicalhealthguidelineAntimony (Australia)drinking waterunknown0.003 mg/LAustralia (NHMRC and NRMMC, 2011). Key endpoint: Decreased lifespan, altered blood glucose and cholesterol.high
#P005chemicalhealthunknownAntimony (EU)drinking waterunknown0.01 mg/LEU (2020).high
#P006operationaloperationalrecommendedSource water monitoring frequencydrinking waterrequirementyearly frequencyMonitoring of source water should be conducted yearly to determine if antimony is present.Authorities may consider reduced monitoring when it has been demonstrated that antimony is not present and/or appropriate treatment is in place.high
#P007operationaltreatmentrecommendedAdsorption treatment monitoring frequencydrinking waterrequirement>= quarterly frequencyIf adsorption is used for antimony removal.Or a method to estimate BVs to breakthrough should be used to predict media replacement.high
#P008operationalreportingrecommendedCompliance monitoring frequencydrinking waterrequirement>= annually frequencyWhen treatment is in place for antimony removal to confirm the proposed MAC is not exceeded.high
#P009chemicalhealthguidelineAntimony Health Canada NOAELdrinking waterunknown0.06 mg/kg bw per dayLiver effects: anisokaryosis; biochemical changes related to liver histological changes (Poon et al., 1998)high
#P010chemicalhealthguidelineAntimony Health Canada TDIdrinking waterunknown0.0002 mg/kg bw per dayTolerable daily intake for derivation of Canadian proposed MAC.high
#P011physicalhealthguidelineAntimony Health Canada BWdrinking waterunknown74 kgBody weight used for MAC derivation.high
#P012physicalhealthguidelineAntimony Health Canada Drinking Water Intakedrinking waterunknown1.53 L/dDrinking water intake used for MAC derivation.high
#P013chemicalhealthguidelineAntimony Health Canada Allocation Factordrinking waterunknown30 %Allocation factor used for MAC derivation.high
#P014chemicalhealthguidelineAntimony Health Canada Uncertainty Factordrinking waterunknown300Uncertainty factor used for derivation of Canadian proposed MAC.high
#P015chemicalhealthmandatoryAntimony US EPA LOAELdrinking waterunknown0.43 mg/kg bw per dayKey endpoint: Decreased lifespan, increased blood glucose and cholesterol (Schroeder, 1970).high
#P016chemicalhealthmandatoryAntimony US EPA Uncertainty Factordrinking waterunknown1000Uncertainty factor used by US EPA.high
#P017chemicalhealthmandatoryAntimony US EPA RfDdrinking waterunknown0.0004 mg/kg bw per dayReference dose used by US EPA.high
#P018physicalhealthmandatoryAntimony US EPA Body Weightdrinking waterunknown70 kgBody weight used by US EPA.high
#P019physicalhealthmandatoryAntimony US EPA Drinking Water Intakedrinking waterunknown2 L/dDrinking water intake used by US EPA.high
#P020chemicalhealthmandatoryAntimony US EPA Allocation Factordrinking waterunknown40 %Allocation factor used by US EPA.high
#P021chemicalhealthguidelineAntimony WHO NOAELdrinking waterunknown6 mg/kg bw per dayKey endpoint: Reduced body weight gain and reduced food and water intake in rats (Poon et al., 1998).high
#P022chemicalhealthguidelineAntimony WHO Uncertainty Factordrinking waterunknown1000Uncertainty factor used by WHO.high
#P023chemicalhealthguidelineAntimony WHO TDIdrinking waterunknown0.006 mg/kg bw per dayTolerable daily intake used by WHO.high
#P024physicalhealthguidelineAntimony WHO Body Weightdrinking waterunknown60 kgBody weight used by WHO.high
#P025physicalhealthguidelineAntimony WHO Drinking Water Intakedrinking waterunknown2 L/dDrinking water intake used by WHO.high
#P026chemicalhealthguidelineAntimony WHO Allocation Factordrinking waterunknown10 %Allocation factor used by WHO.high
#P027chemicalhealthguidelineAntimony Australia LOELdrinking waterunknown0.43 mg/kg bw per dayKey endpoint: Decreased lifespan, altered blood glucose and cholesterol (Schroeder, 1970).high
#P028chemicalhealthguidelineAntimony Australia Uncertainty Factordrinking waterunknown500Uncertainty factor used by Australia.high
#P029physicalhealthguidelineAntimony Australia Body Weightdrinking waterunknown70 kgBody weight used by Australia.high
#P030physicalhealthguidelineAntimony Australia Drinking Water Intakedrinking waterunknown2 L/dDrinking water intake used by Australia.high
#P031chemicalhealthguidelineAntimony Australia Allocation Factordrinking waterunknown10 %Allocation factor used by Australia.high

D Definitions (0)

No definitions.