Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (Lock A locked padlock) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Related Information * National Recommended Human Health Criteria Table * BEACH Act * 2004 Bacteria Rule for Coastal and Great Lakes Recreation * Health and Water Research * Health Advisory Documents for Microbial Contaminants * Microbiological Risk Assessment Tools, Methods, and Approaches for Water Media * Microbial Risk Assessment Thesaurus
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency develops criteria to protect people from organisms, such as viruses and bacteria, and their associated toxins in water bodies (e.g., lakes, rivers, beaches). Swimming and other recreational activities in contaminated water can make people ill. The EPA's recommended criteria limit certain organisms and their associated toxins in water bodies to protect human health. State and Tribal governments can use the recommended criteria as guidance when setting their own water quality standards to protect human health. On this page: * 2012 Recreational Water Quality Criteria (RWQC) for Bacterial Indicators of Fecal Contamination * Criteria Adoption and Implementation * Five-Year Reviews of the 2012 RWQC * Microbiological Test Methods for Ambient Waters * Secondary Contact Recreational Water Quality Standards * 2019 Recreational Water Quality Criteria and Swimming Advisories for Cyanotoxins * Criteria Adoption and Implementation * Cyanotoxin Identification and Detection Methods for Drinking and Ambient Freshwaters * Under Development: Recreational Water Quality Criteria for Coliphage * 2021 National Recreational Water Quality Workshop * 2016 Recreational Waters Conference
The EPA issued its current ambient water quality criteria recommendations for recreational waters in 2012, reflecting the latest scientific knowledge, public comments and external peer review. The criteria are designed to protect the public from exposure to harmful levels of pathogens while participating in water-contact activities, such as swimming, wading and surfing, in all water bodies designated for such recreational uses. The EPA issues such recommendations under the authority of the Clean Water Act (CWA). Amendments to the CWA by the Beaches Environmental Assessment and Coastal Health (BEACH) Act of 2000 directed the EPA to conduct studies associated with pathogens and human health, and to publish new or revised criteria recommendations for pathogens and pathogen indicators based on those studies. Prior to 2012, the EPA had last issued RWQC in 1986. * Scientific Workshops and Research Supporting Development of the 2012 RWQC * News Release: EPA Recommends New Recreational Water Quality Criteria to Better Protect Public Health (November 26, 2012) * (160.93 KB, December 2012, EPA 820-F-12-061) * (775.1 KB, EPA 820-F-12-058) * (25.55 KB, October 27, 2014) * (84.65 KB) * (134.1 KB) * (96.04 KB) * Docket with technical support documentsExit EPA’s website (Docket ID EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0466)
The EPA’s nationally recommended RWQC are applicable for ambient waters designated for primary contact recreation. However, there are waterbodies with conditions that differ from those that formed the basis for the 2012 RWQC. Additionally, scientific advancements may provide additional approaches and new technologies for enumerating fecal-associated microbes. The EPA has developed two technical support documents (TSMs) to assist states and Tribes with deriving alternative RWQC for waterbodies with 1) predominantly non-human fecal pollution loading; or 2) a different microorganism and/or enumeration method than those the EPA recommended nationally in 2012. States and Tribes can transparently develop alternative water quality criteria that are scientifically defensible and protective of human health to the same level as EPA’s 2012 RWQC. * Predominantly Non-human Fecal Sources * This document describes the use of a quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA)-based approach to estimate recreator health risks from recreational exposure to waters with predominantly non-human fecal loading scenarios and to develop alternative water quality criteria based on the sources of fecal indicator bacteria and pathogens affecting a waterbody. Appendices in the document describe conducting a sanitary investigation, developing a sampling and analysis plan, and contain open-source code to assist running the QMRA analyses in Python or R. * (9.76 MB, July 2024, EPA 822-R-24-013) * (149.79 KB, July 2024) * Alternative Indicators and Methods * This document describes an approach to develop alternative WQC using enumeration methods for fecal indicator organisms that the EPA has not validated and issued. The document also provides a scientifically defensible approach for gathering the needed information and data to support the use of an alternative enumeration method. The EPA also provides a spreadsheet-based tool, “Alternative Methods Calculator Tool,” to be used in conjunction with the technical support document and a user’s guide for the tool. The Alternative Methods Calculator Tool calculates the index of agreement and R-squared values, and graphs user-collected water quality data. * (2.7 MB, December 2014, EPA 820-R-14-011) * (69 KB, November 2021, EPA 821-B-21-002) * (178.03 KB, November 2021, EPA 821-F-21-005) * (149.96 KB, November 2021, EPA 821-B-21-001)
The EPA is required by the BEACH Act amendments to CWA section 304(a)(9)(B) to conduct reviews every five years of the agency's RWQC. In conducting these reviews, the EPA considers several factors, such as the availability and evaluation of new science, the review of information related to the underlying science used to develop the RWQC, additional implementation support needs, and perceived barriers to state adoption. An important goal of these reviews is to document the assessment of whether revisions to the current RWQC are necessary. * Five-Year Reviews of EPA’s RWQC
The user guide helps states and authorized Tribes utilize the scientific information in the white paper to protect their waters designated for secondary contact recreation. * (540.21 KB, July 2024, EPA 820-B-24-001)
In 2019, the EPA issued final recommended recreational ambient water quality criteria or swimming advisories for two cyanotoxins, microcystins and cylindrospermopsin. The agency has identified recommended concentrations of these cyanotoxins at or below which human health is protected while swimming or participating in other recreational activities in and on the water. States, territories, and authorized Tribes can consider adopting these recommended criteria into their water quality standards and using them for CWA purposes. Alternatively, they can use these values as the basis of swimming advisories for public notification purposes at recreational waters. * Federal Register Notice: Recommended Human Health Recreational Ambient Water Quality Criteria or Swimming Advisories for Microcystins and CylindrospermopsinExit EPA’s website (June 6, 2019) * (147.85 KB, May 2019, EPA 822-F-19-001) * (2.4 MB, May 2019, EPA 822-R-19-001) * (500.75 KB, May 2019, EPA 822-R-19-002)
The EPA published a final technical support document that explains how states, territories, and authorized Tribes may adopt the EPA’s 2019 recommended criteria for two cyanotoxins into their water quality standards or use the criteria in swimming advisory programs. The document also addresses implementation of the 2019 criteria recommendations through other CWA programs including identifying and listing of impaired waters, and total maximum daily load (TMDL) development. * (577.85 KB, July 2021, EPA 823-R-21-002)
The EPA held a Coliphage Experts Workshop in March 2016 as part of the agency's ongoing efforts to build the scientific basis for developing coliphage-based water quality criteria. The EPA convened a group of 12 internationally recognized experts on the state of the science of coliphage and their usefulness as a viral indicator for the protection of public health in recreational waters. Experts represented a spectrum of perspectives from academia, federal agencies (the EPA, the CDC, and the FDA), and the wastewater industry. Discussion topics included: the need for a viral indicator; coliphage as a predictor of gastrointestinal illnesses; how coliphage may be useful as an indicator of wastewater treatment performance; male-specific vs somatic coliphage; a systematic literature review of viral densities; and future research. The Coliphage Experts Workshop Proceedings document details the topics and overall findings from the Workshop. Additionally, the document provides the experts’ written responses to charge questions provided prior to the Workshop. The Proceedings document was peer-reviewed. * Fact Sheet: 2016 Coliphage Experts Workshop * Proceedings Document: 2016 Coliphage Experts Workshop
This is a literature review of the scientific information that the EPA will evaluate to develop coliphage-based ambient water quality criteria for the protection of swimmers. It generally indicates that coliphages are equally good indicators of fecal contamination as the EPA’s currently recommended criteria for E. coli and enterococci. In addition, coliphages are better indicators of viruses in treated wastewater than bacteria. While the EPA conducts its evaluation of coliphages as possible viral indicators for water quality, we continue to recommend that states adopt our 2012 RWQC into their water quality standards. * Report: Review of Coliphages as Possible Indicators of Fecal Contamination for Ambient Water Quality
Open Sidenav Menu Close Sidenav Menu Contact Us about Water Quality Criteria Contact Us about Water Quality Criteria to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem. Last updated on October 8, 2025 Welcome! Please share your feedback on how we can make www.epa.gov work better for you. A red asterisk (*) indicates a required field.
Thank you. Your feedback has been received.
alert message Required Questions - page 1 of 2 question_55203_answer_01 How would you rate your experience on www.epa.gov today? *
0 Stars 1 Star 2 Stars 3 Stars 4 Stars 5 Stars Please explain the reason for your rating. * 400 characters allowed Would you like to take two more minutes to answer more questions to help us improve our services? Yes, keep going → No, only submit these responses Optional questions - page 2 of 2 How would you describe yourself? Business Government employee Scientist Student Other Enter other text Please tell us why you visited www.epa.gov today. 400 characters allowed Did you visit www.epa.gov to accomplish a specific task? If yes, please explain why you were able or unable to accomplish your task. 400 characters allowed How can we make www.epa.gov a more helpful website? 400 characters allowed Submit []: required